![]() |
Match report |
|
Swansea City 1 v 3 Luton Town | |
|
Swansea
Freestone Howard De-Vulgt Mumford O'Leary Todd Coates Casey # Brodie Watkin Williams & Jones Romo #46 Cusack Smith Sidibe &67
Luton
Referee
Attendance
|
Send in your match report for inclusion on this page.
Congratulations to Luton, 10 straight wins a 3-1 away win, and
returning to Division 2 after only one season. They came, they saw,
they conquered.
Well enough of the politeness, let's get down to a few
facts. It was a perfect day for football, the weather more
apt for a first game of the season, a large away
following, boosting the crowd to over 5400 and setting up
what would be a cup-tie atmosphere. Then reality set in.
I was for most of the time a dull uninspiring match with
very little goalmouth action which seems a strange
statement considering the scoreline. The first half was
played in midfield with neither goalkeeper being called
into action. There were some personal battles going on
with many late and niggling challenges. Howard was booked
for a late tackle on Valois who made the most of it by
rolling around on the floor. His antics found him being
booed every time he touched the ball after that, and was
replaced at half time.
Luton were playing for fouls and
when Bayliss fell awkwardly he found the sympathy from the
Swans fans until it could be seen had either an arm or
shoulder injury. A stretcher was called for, but not used,
and as the 'green medics' left the pitch near the half way
line in front of the North Bank, there appeared to be a
golf ball thrown at them (Ian W can you confirm?). This
was not spotted by the officials, so hopefully will not be
reported.
The game came to life for a few minutes with goalmouth action from the
Swans which nearly ended with a goal when a couple of attempts in the
six yard box were cleared by the Luton defence. Luton then broke on
the counter attack on the right and after Rog had forced their player
wide he crossed to Taylor who planted the ball into an unguarded net.
Luton nearly scored their second when the defence allowed Valois a
curling shot on goal, which Rog saved sharply to his right. Most of
the Swans attacking outlets were down the left but came to nothing as
Casey was having a dreadful game.
The
second half saw Casey replaced by Romo, which in effect
brought us back to 11 men. The second half was much like
the first with again no real goalmouth action. Mumford did
have one attempt which was blocked by the wall but Watkin
& Brodie unable to pick the half-chance.
Luton got their
second in a debatable fashion when Crowe seemed offside
when receiving a through ball, and with Rog saving the
shot the rebound fell to Holmes who found an empty net.
The third came in similar fashion when another through
ball found Rog unprotected and Howard scored from the edge
of the area. Luton did have 2 further chances both spoiled
by last gasp tackles by O'Leary. We did nick a consolation
goal through Mumford when a long-range daisy cutter got a
deflection and ended in the corner of the net. The goal
received very little cheers as by then the ground was
close to empty leaving the Luton fans to celebrate at the
final whistle.
So much for the match itself. We started this report with
'they came, they saw, they conquered', That is what it
feels like it was men against boys. Luton did not play any
flowing football, but seemed stronger and fitter and had
the will to win.
As in many of our reports this season we
have said that we are a lightweight team. This was again
evident today, many players bottled the 50/50 balls and
showed little interest in getting a result. Rog had very
little to do. O'Leary & Mumford can be excused the
criticism. The rest either showed lack of passion and
pride or have yet again proved not up to the standard
required.
It hurts to make these comments but our future
as a club depends on the close season decisions. With a
reported 900 players to be released we must pick up at
least 5 who have battling qualities. The next 2 years are
going to be very difficult, financially. We need better
gates and cannot rely on youth players coming through.
Some might disagree and point to the progression Mumford has made.
We'll end with off field comments. Today again saw a large
police presence, who after Luton's first goal ringed the
pitch between the away end and the North Bank. The first
15 mins saw a group of Luton fans!!! act aggressively
towards the North Bank, which was met with a few surges
towards the pitch. Luckily no pitch invasions, (apart from
one person running onto the pitch in front of the main
stand with a Welsh flag) which could have resulted in a
fine, that we as a club cannot afford.
We also cannot
afford the large policing bills games like today bring,
and do not wish to see the sight of police in riot gear
facing the fans. Banter is all part of football, but why
do we still see the extremes at our games. Every pound
counts.
A beautiful day and a large crowd (5,436) welcomed Luton's arrival at Vetch Field, and with a fan following that any home side would have been proud of. The vocals of the visiting fans created a great atmosphere for the match, which if Luton won, would secure their promotion back into Division 2.
The Swans fielded the same side that played Barry in midweek, and Darlington last Saturday with a 4-4-2 formation.
On the bench were – Jones, Romo, Sidibe, Cusack and Smith
The first half hour of the game saw the Swans have the majority of the possession, but despite this, there was a hugely disappointing failure by them to make any impression. The lack of penetration in front of goal is nothing short of woeful. We appear to be carrying three players in Watkin, Coates and Brodie who when given the ball and opportunity in an attacking position, can do little else but pass back or look to move the ball sideward. Where is the killer instinct that strikers, and attacking midfielders are supposed to possess?
Today's efforts on that front were partly limited anyway by the atrocious performance of Casey. The lack of effort, interest and basic skill that he demonstrates in a game is unbelievable, and if a contract is offered to a player like this, in the position we are at present then serious questions will need to be asked. A gentleman sitting behind us was very entertaining in his commentary on Casey's performance. More to the point he was very accurate – 'Bejaysus, what am I supposed to be doing with this ball now? I don't want it'.
Unfortunately today, Casey's performance was not isolated. Once we fell behind on 31 minutes to a poor goal with the defence nowhere, we seemed to lose faith in our abilities. De Vulgt, Coates, Howard and Todd all showed a lack of ability to weight a pass, and find their team mates, and once more, time and again we gave possession away and made life very difficult for ourselves.
Half time came, and we had really only created a couple of openings, with our best chance coming from a 6 yard scramble towards the end of the half. Certainly changes were needed. Both sides took the opportunity to replace players during the interval, but none so sensible as Casey being replaced by Romo.
As the second half progressed, Luton started to take control of the game. They were not an outstanding side particularly, but were doing enough to contain Swansea, and it always seemed likely that a second goal would seal it for them. Then shortly after Sidibe had replaced Williams on 57 minutes, the second came. Luton broke through the defence, and despite Roger Freestone blocking the shot with his feet, the ball went loose and was hammered in on the rebound.
Ten minutes or so later, came Swansea's best chance of the half so far, when Sidibe headed across goal from Romo's corner, but the ball went wide. With the exception of Mumford's consolation goal just into injury time, that was the end of Swansea' goal attempts. The third Luton goal came from a defensive error by Todd, with about 15 minutes to go, and but for two superb tackles by Man of the Match (say the Famous Five) O'Leary, the score would have been worse. The Luton keeper did not have a save to make throughout the game, and that is so frustrating.
In the end were we close to getting a result in this match? Answer No where 'Kinnear.
So where are we now. Looking at things overall, we played a team who were going for automatic promotion. They got it, without playing well, but we caused them little or no discomfort.
Cusack kept the same team as has played in the last two games, and I am not sure what benefit that was today. We have four games left, and decisions need to be made around retained lists and contracts. I cannot see what Cusack has learned from today, other than maybe a career with PFA isn't such a bad thing, and that Casey should be released without question. However, if he didn't know that already we should be worried. Do you think that the whole crowd can be wrong and the management team right?
Why is Jason Smith on the bench but not brought on to test the ankle? Will Jason Jones ever get a game to prove whether he is worth keeping or not. Will any youngsters taste first team football before next season? We are not just talking about contract renewals; we are looking at retention or release of players to enable us to build a squad that will give us a chance to move forward.
Too many of our players look jaded. Some of them run and work hard throughout the game, but it is often unnecessary and unproductive work. Effort doesn't equal output. We are trying too often to play fancy football in positions where we need to move the ball firmly and quickly. This is Division 3, and will be for a long time unless we get players who can play the way we need to, to get out of it.
Throughout this season, the players have had the benefit of the doubt due to off the field circumstances. The crowds have been lenient, but that is all passed. There is nowhere to hide now. Bad performances are just that – bad performances, no mitigating circumstances anymore. There doesn't seem to be such a thing as a 50/50 ball anymore. If it gets to that stage with most players, it's the oppositions, end of story.
Another point worth mentioning, Mumford was booked for throwing the ball at an opponent. Being one of our better players, we can ill afford to lose him through stupid suspensions for incidents like that. A bit of discipline work in the summer may be worthwhile.
Let's hope we move into 2002/2003 season with that in mind, and with one focus; to play football as it needs to be played to get out of this division. I am sure that we will be doing it without a few of the names mentioned below.
Next stop Rushden and Diamonds, and the Famous Five will be there to see it all. The reports are critical, but are they unjustified?
Marks as follows: -
SUBS
David Romo - 5 - Obviously working hard in the hope of a new contract, but surely too little too late |